Solana startups spin up validators for revenue and ‘soft power’

Solana validators can reap benefits including payments, votes and community clout

article-image

Artwork by Crystal Le

share

This is a segment from the Lightspeed newsletter. To read full editions, subscribe.


Two weeks ago, Solana validators voted down SIMD-0228, a proposal that would have significantly cut network inflation. Still, core Solana stakeholders seem interested in cutting inflation at some point, a prospect that would hurt the bottom line for validators.

Validators run Solana’s software to help add blocks to the blockchain, and they’re paid for the labor partly via inflation. Validators can be pretty much anyone with some pricey hardware and internet access, but in a world of lower SOL inflation, it may become less worthwhile to run a Solana validator for financial reasons. Instead, startups building businesses on Solana can reap unique benefits from running a validator, and some have already taken the leap.

“[We] have seen a big push over the past six months,” InfStones head of global sales Parker Poor said when I asked about Solana-native teams wanting to spin up validators.

The Solana payments business Sphere is one such example, although it runs its validator nodes itself rather than through a staking provider.

“[SOL] issuance getting cut is probably inevitable,” Sphere CEO Arnold Lee said, but he added that running a validator “would probably still be worth it for distribution and alignment,” even if it failed to turn a profit. 

Solana’s process for protocol governance involves validators voting on proposals based on their share of delegated staked SOL. Solana startups need to run validators if they want a direct say in the future direction of the network.

“[C]ontested votes like [SIMD-228] underscore the strategic importance of having a seat at the table to make these decisions,” Bernat Fages, co-founder of the node operator firm Firstset, said in a text.

Beyond the rare contested vote, running a validator can confer “soft power” on startup teams as well, Lee said. Users who like the startup’s product might delegate some stake, Lee added. Or it could be even simpler than that: “Toly [Solana’s co-founder] will probably want to retweet you if you’re really active in governance.”

A Solana validator’s financial prospects mainly revolve around the validator’s ability to attract stakers. Solana startups with significant distribution can effectively monetize that mindshare with a validator. 

The RPC provider Helius is a popular example of this: The company’s CEO (and Lightspeed podcast co-host) Mert Mumtaz is big on Crypto Twitter, which partly helped Helius to become the largest Solana validator based on publicly available records. Solana prioritizes network traffic based on stake, so Helius has an incentive to gather more stake to make its RPCs more effective. 

Down the line, there are other ways Solana startups could make use of validator operations. Lee offered an interesting thought: Apps could give users perks like lower fees in exchange for staking with the app’s validator, kind of like a Solana-native customer loyalty program.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Marina Bay Sands Singapore

October 7, 2026

DAS Asia is a a single-day summit at Marina Bay Sands Singapore featuring conversations between the builders, investors, and global leaders are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in Asia & North America.

Hilton Park Lane, London

November 10-11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

recent research

Onchain Gacha Cover Image.png

Research

Onchain gacha platforms sold $284.3 million of digital card packs in July 2026, and Collector Crypt accounted for more than half of that activity. However, it buys back 92.9% of what it sells, which leaves it with a third of the category's revenue on more than half of its volume, and a quarter of its activity arrives through partner apps whose users it does not own. Courtyard runs the opposite model, a consumer app selling smaller packs to thousands of retail buyers who resell the cards to each other, and it took 59.7% of category revenue while growing through a month the category spent contracting. This report compares the five largest platforms on gross activity, buyback intensity, revenue after buybacks, consumer composition, marketplace liquidity, and distribution ownership, and finds Courtyard the strongest performer as of July 2026, with the qualification that none of the five discloses inventory costs or resale proceeds, so no platform in the category can yet be shown to be profitable.

Newsletter

The Breakdown

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Blockworks Research

Unlock crypto's most powerful research platform.

Our research packs a punch and gives you actionable takeaways for each topic.

SubscribeGet in touch

Blockworks Inc.

133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Blockworks Network

PodcastsNewslettersEventsRoundtablesAnalytics