Polkadot-Powered Stablecoin Tanks As Hackers Mint 1.3B Tokens 

Hackers minted themselves 1.3 billion aUSD tokens on Sunday, sending the dollar-pegged stablecoin as low as $0.07 on KuCoin

article-image

Acala deity in Buddha Tooth Relic Temple in Singapore | Source: Shutterstock

share
  • Hackers attacked Acala’s new liquidity pool to mint more than one billion aUSD tokens
  • aUSD crashed almost immediately but has since rebounded, now trading above $0.90

Polkadot-powered stablecoin acala dollar (aUSD) crashed to below 10 cents on Sunday after hackers minted 1.3 billion of the tokens for free.

The stablecoin’s issuing network Acala voted to suspend functionality to address the situation. In a tweet on Sunday, Acala said it noticed a configuration issue on its stablecoin protocol Honzon, which directly affects how aUSD operates.

Acala, one of the first Polkadot parachains, styles itself as a “DeFi hub” for the network. It had just launched a yield-bearing liquidity pool for aUSD and a form of wrapped bitcoin, which contained a bug dictating how the pool pays out rewards.

On-chain observers found hackers had exploited the flaw to mint 1.3 billion aUSD, with one attacker wallet holding about 1.27 billion aUSD. 

The incident resulted in aUSD, which had held its soft peg since its February launch, crashing as low as $0.07 on KuCoin, echoing TerraUSD’s collapse in May. 

However, aUSD quickly rebounded and now trades for more than $0.90. Blockchain explorers show aUSD’s official supply is almost 4.8 million tokens.

While Acala’s Honzon protocol manages the stablecoin based on various risk management algorithms, aUSD’s value is also derived from a basket of reserve assets, mostly Polkadot ecosystem tokens. Users can mint aUSD by sending certain digital assets to the protocol.

“This enables people to transact, trade, and facilitate services using aUSD without price volatility,” it said in aUSD’s announcement post.

Polkadot networks handle hackers with governance votes

Acala has labeled the snafu a “misconfiguration,” saying it had been rectified the same day and wallet addresses that received the erroneously-minted aUSD had been identified.

The network itself hasn’t disclosed the amount of tokens printed throughout the incident, but said it managed to retain over 99% of the tokens involved.

The remaining illicit aUSD has been locked until a collective governance decision on what to do next has been voted upon, Acala added.

Loading Tweet..

Last October, experimental Polkadot implementation Kusama similarly voted to manage a security vulnerability involving stolen tokens.

Both Acala Network and co-founder Bette Chen didn’t return Blockworks’ request for comment by press time.

Acala’s ACA has shed about 13% since the attack. Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao said in a tweet that the exchange was “monitoring” the situation. Binance doesn’t list aUSD but does support ACA trade.

David Canellis contributed reporting.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Marina Bay Sands Singapore

October 7, 2026

DAS Asia is a a single-day summit at Marina Bay Sands Singapore featuring conversations between the builders, investors, and global leaders are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in Asia & North America.

Hilton Park Lane, London

November 10-11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

recent research

Onchain Gacha Cover Image.png

Research

Onchain gacha platforms sold $284.3 million of digital card packs in July 2026, and Collector Crypt accounted for more than half of that activity. However, it buys back 92.9% of what it sells, which leaves it with a third of the category's revenue on more than half of its volume, and a quarter of its activity arrives through partner apps whose users it does not own. Courtyard runs the opposite model, a consumer app selling smaller packs to thousands of retail buyers who resell the cards to each other, and it took 59.7% of category revenue while growing through a month the category spent contracting. This report compares the five largest platforms on gross activity, buyback intensity, revenue after buybacks, consumer composition, marketplace liquidity, and distribution ownership, and finds Courtyard the strongest performer as of July 2026, with the qualification that none of the five discloses inventory costs or resale proceeds, so no platform in the category can yet be shown to be profitable.

Newsletter

The Breakdown

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Blockworks Research

Unlock crypto's most powerful research platform.

Our research packs a punch and gives you actionable takeaways for each topic.

SubscribeGet in touch

Blockworks Inc.

133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Blockworks Network

PodcastsNewslettersEventsRoundtablesAnalytics