CFTC Charges 4 in Crypto Ponzi Scheme as Questions Swirl Over Jurisdiction

The case has attorneys puzzled over which US agency has jurisdiction

article-image

Commodity Futures Trading Commission | Source: Shutterstock

share
  • The CFTC has charged four individuals it claims were involved in operating a ponzi scheme that swindled $44 million of bitcoin from investors
  • Regulators should focus on establishing rules rather than retroactive charges, one attorney said

A US regulator has charged four individuals with fraud surrounding an alleged crypto ponzi scheme that raised more than $44 million of bitcoin.

The case, brought by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), highlights the escalating jurisdiction battle over digital asset regulation, an attorney said.

“This case is indicative of the high-profile matters regulatory agencies desire when it comes to crypto oversight,” Braden Perry, partner at Kennyhertz Perry, said. “[There is] a rift between regulators, and the jurisdictional war has been ongoing between the CFTC and [the Securities and Exchange Commission], who are fighting to expand their regulatory remit over the crypto and [decentralized finance] industry.”

The CFTC has charged Florida resident Dwayne Golden, North Carolina resident Marquis Egerton, New York resident Gregory Aggesen and Indian citizen Jatin Patel in connection to the ponzi scheme. 

According to the complaint filed Tuesday, the quartet operated several websites — Empowercoin, Ecoinplus and later JetCoin — from April to August 2017.

The sites promised users that invested funds would be doubled in less than two months and guaranteed between 2% and 5% of daily accruals. The twist, according to the CFTC: The payouts stemmed from funds from new investors.

The CFTC alleged the accused pocketed $10 million from Empowercoin and Ecoinplus — they allegedly received a total of $23 million in bitcoin, valued at the time of investment, from the two sites. They took home about $7.8 million of the $21.7 million raised through JetCoin.

In July 2017, the Ecoinplus website went offline, and by August, JetCoin was shut down. Customers from either website did not receive funds, according to the CFTC.

The charges are based on violations of anti-fraud measures laid out in the Commodity Exchange Act and CFTC rules, according to Perry.

“This is different from CFTC regulating the spot bitcoin [market], and there is still much industry confusion about what agency, if any, regulates bitcoin as a commodity,” Perry said.

The CFTC filed civil charges, but the American defendants are also facing criminal charges from the Justice Department for wire fraud and money laundering. If convicted, the defendants could face time in federal prison.

The battle between agencies over crypto regulation isn’t helping to bring clarity to the space, according to Perry.

“The last thing any industry wants is what regulators have been doing in the cryptocurrency space: regulation by enforcement, in which agencies decide that some practices should have been illegal, and instead of declaring it illegal from now on through rulemaking, go back and prosecute the people who were doing it before,” Perry said.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Marina Bay Sands Singapore

October 7, 2026

DAS Asia is a a single-day summit at Marina Bay Sands Singapore featuring conversations between the builders, investors, and global leaders are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in Asia & North America.

Hilton Park Lane, London

November 10-11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

recent research

Onchain Gacha Cover Image.png

Research

Onchain gacha platforms sold $284.3 million of digital card packs in July 2026, and Collector Crypt accounted for more than half of that activity. However, it buys back 92.9% of what it sells, which leaves it with a third of the category's revenue on more than half of its volume, and a quarter of its activity arrives through partner apps whose users it does not own. Courtyard runs the opposite model, a consumer app selling smaller packs to thousands of retail buyers who resell the cards to each other, and it took 59.7% of category revenue while growing through a month the category spent contracting. This report compares the five largest platforms on gross activity, buyback intensity, revenue after buybacks, consumer composition, marketplace liquidity, and distribution ownership, and finds Courtyard the strongest performer as of July 2026, with the qualification that none of the five discloses inventory costs or resale proceeds, so no platform in the category can yet be shown to be profitable.

Newsletter

The Breakdown

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Blockworks Research

Unlock crypto's most powerful research platform.

Our research packs a punch and gives you actionable takeaways for each topic.

SubscribeGet in touch

Blockworks Inc.

133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Blockworks Network

PodcastsNewslettersEventsRoundtablesAnalytics