Anti-Surveillance CBDC Bill Won’t Protect Privacy: Advocacy Group

Digital rights group Fight for the Future reckons Rep. Emmer’s bill would allow the private sector to profit from an eventual US CBDC

article-image

Shutterstock.com/Andrii Malkov, modified by Blockworks

share

Digital rights group Fight for the Future isn’t convinced by a new CBDC anti-surveillance bill pitched to the US House Financial Services Committee.

US Congressman Tom Emmer introduced the “CBDC Anti-Surveillance Act” earlier this week. Co-sponsored by nine other Republicans, H.R 1122 seeks to amend the Federal Reserve Act to prohibit Fed banks from offering central bank digital currencies (CBDC)s to individuals.

It also seeks to prohibit the use of a digital dollar for the implementation of monetary policy. The act aligns with Emmer’s previous attempts to bar the Fed from issuing a CBDC directly to individuals in the name of privacy preservation. 

The fear is that CBDCs could expose individuals to unnecessary surveillance risks by the state — empowered by its newfound ability to track and trace every penny.

“Any digital version of the dollar must uphold our American values of privacy, individual sovereignty and free market competitiveness,” Emmer said in a statement. “Anything less opens the door to the development of a dangerous surveillance tool.”

Fight for the Future, however, has a problem with Emmer’s alternative to the Fed’s potential handling of CBDC transactions: private financial companies.

“Rep. Emmer is correct that a poorly-built digital dollar would cement surveillance and extremely concerning economic controls into our daily lives,” Fight for the Future said. 

It added: “We also agree on the need for the government to be transparent about CBDC projects — but where this bill falls short is in positioning the private sector as the sole option for intermediating digital dollar transactions.”

Invasive surveillance and morality policing are prevalent in various financial institutions such as Wells Fargo and Venmo, the nonprofit said in its own statement. Fight for the Future believes the bill would contribute to endangering vulnerable communities, including activists and abortion patients.

“The well-executed digital dollar the US deserves would provide the same level of privacy that cash has offered for millennia, by design,” the group said. “We need real alternatives with end-to-end encryption level privacy baked into the code itself.”

The Federal Reserve System is composed of 12 regional banks located throughout the US and a Board of Governors located in Washington, D.C.

“Financial surveillance, whether done by the government or financial institutions, treats everyone as if we are guilty until proven innocent and as if privacy is not a fundamental human right,” said Fight for the Future.

The group posited major financial institutions may resist implementing cash-level privacy, as it would impact profits deriving from exploiting personal data. 

In any case, the legislative process for Emmer’s bill has only just begun. A committee review comes next, before potentially proceeding to the House or Senate for consideration. From there, it would need to be signed by President Joe Biden into law.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Marina Bay Sands Singapore

October 7, 2026

DAS Asia is a a single-day summit at Marina Bay Sands Singapore featuring conversations between the builders, investors, and global leaders are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in Asia & North America.

Hilton Park Lane, London

November 10-11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

recent research

Onchain Gacha Cover Image.png

Research

Onchain gacha platforms sold $284.3 million of digital card packs in July 2026, and Collector Crypt accounted for more than half of that activity. However, it buys back 92.9% of what it sells, which leaves it with a third of the category's revenue on more than half of its volume, and a quarter of its activity arrives through partner apps whose users it does not own. Courtyard runs the opposite model, a consumer app selling smaller packs to thousands of retail buyers who resell the cards to each other, and it took 59.7% of category revenue while growing through a month the category spent contracting. This report compares the five largest platforms on gross activity, buyback intensity, revenue after buybacks, consumer composition, marketplace liquidity, and distribution ownership, and finds Courtyard the strongest performer as of July 2026, with the qualification that none of the five discloses inventory costs or resale proceeds, so no platform in the category can yet be shown to be profitable.

Newsletter

The Breakdown

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Blockworks Research

Unlock crypto's most powerful research platform.

Our research packs a punch and gives you actionable takeaways for each topic.

SubscribeGet in touch

Blockworks Inc.

133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Blockworks Network

PodcastsNewslettersEventsRoundtablesAnalytics