Banks Should Back Deposits From Crypto Customers With Cash: US Agencies

Banks should not lend deposits made by crypto customers and should hold cash to back all deposits, the statement said

article-image

Daniel J. Macy/Shutterstock.com modified by Blockworks

share

US financial regulators joined forces again this week to make sure banks got the message: They need to take risks associated with crypto seriously.

But so far, no new requirements have been issued. 

Firms have been put on notice that careful risk assessments need to happen, but the latest statement is in no way creating new policies, the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC) and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) said. 

The new statement, issued Thursday, is intended to “remind banking organizations to apply existing risk management principles” when it comes to crypto-related activities.

Banks should consider “concentration and interconnectedness” across deposits and potential liquidity risks. Firms are also advised to complete “robust due diligence and ongoing monitoring” of all crypto activity.

Thursday’s statement is an update to the warning issued by the same three groups in January. The agencies are primarily concerned with volatility and liquidity risks on exchanges and with stablecoin reserves, the new statement added, and banks need to take the proper precautions. 

Regulators said banks should not lend deposits made by crypto customers and should hold cash to back all deposits.

“One read of the follow-up is that it’s positive insofar that the regulators specifically clarify they aren’t banning banks from banking crypto,” Galaxy Digital analysts wrote in a note Friday. “This could be seen as slightly softening their prior guidance and genuinely providing a bit more clarity.”

On the other hand, the statement could simply be preemptive of future policy, analysts added. It’s no secret Congress and the SEC are taking a harsher look at the industry, and it’s only a matter of time before banks have new guidelines.

Scrutiny of crypto access to the banking system heats up 

In a Senate hearing earlier this month to discuss recent turmoil in markets, witness Lee Reiners, policy director of the Duke Financial Economics Center, urged lawmakers to isolate digital assets from financial institutions. 

“We should do everything we can to restrict crypto from entering the banking system,” Reiners said in his testimony.  

Banks are starting to take the hint, too. Notoriously crypto-friendly Signature Bank dropped long-term client Binance last month and Custodia’s second bid for Fed supervision was unanimously denied Thursday. 

Custodia is now suing the Fed Board and its Kansas City branch over the dispute. 

“What matters is whether banks are actually being pressured or not, and there is some evidence they are,” Galaxy analysts said. 

“Further, it matters whether the sum of the actions the banking regulators have taken has had an impact on bank’s risk tolerance frameworks, i.e., whether both banks that do and banks that do not provide services to the sector have sufficient clarity or are not otherwise dissuaded from providing services to the crypto sector.”


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Marina Bay Sands Singapore

October 7, 2026

DAS Asia is a a single-day summit at Marina Bay Sands Singapore featuring conversations between the builders, investors, and global leaders are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in Asia & North America.

Hilton Park Lane, London

November 10-11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

recent research

Onchain Gacha Cover Image.png

Research

Onchain gacha platforms sold $284.3 million of digital card packs in July 2026, and Collector Crypt accounted for more than half of that activity. However, it buys back 92.9% of what it sells, which leaves it with a third of the category's revenue on more than half of its volume, and a quarter of its activity arrives through partner apps whose users it does not own. Courtyard runs the opposite model, a consumer app selling smaller packs to thousands of retail buyers who resell the cards to each other, and it took 59.7% of category revenue while growing through a month the category spent contracting. This report compares the five largest platforms on gross activity, buyback intensity, revenue after buybacks, consumer composition, marketplace liquidity, and distribution ownership, and finds Courtyard the strongest performer as of July 2026, with the qualification that none of the five discloses inventory costs or resale proceeds, so no platform in the category can yet be shown to be profitable.

Newsletter

The Breakdown

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Blockworks Research

Unlock crypto's most powerful research platform.

Our research packs a punch and gives you actionable takeaways for each topic.

SubscribeGet in touch

Blockworks Inc.

133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Blockworks Network

PodcastsNewslettersEventsRoundtablesAnalytics