US Treasury Pressure Ideologically Separates MakerDAO Community

MakerDAO struggles to make decisions regarding its stablecoin DAI

article-image

Source: DALL·E

share
  • USDC is currently the largest source of collateral backing DAI at 33.9%
  • Moving 3.5 billion USDC to ether is likely an open invitation to hackers

After MakerDAO’s co-founder Rune Christensen floated converting USDC to ether from the protocol’s treasury backing crypto’s fourth largest stablecoin DAI, community members are torn.

Unlike stablecoin giants Tether and Circle, Maker’s decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) is, as the name suggests, decentralized — so all its decision-making is open to the public. 

Every DAI is overcollateralized by a real-world asset, and DAI’s value is held together by its so-called Price Stability Peg (PSG), which allows USDC holders to swap their tokens for DAI with the protocol.

But since one-third of all DAI is backed by USDC, and after its issuer Circle froze all blacklisted Tornado Cash addresses based on US sanctions, MakerDAOs DAI is hypothetically at risk of depegging, despite the $10.9 billion in digital assets backing it.

MakerDAO figures have voiced concern about the potential for the US Treasury to sanction the smart contract associated with the PSG, which would effectively send the value of USDC sent to the protocol’s stability peg to zero if Circle follows suit.

But moving USDC collateral to ether (ETH) is not a simple task. Luca Prosperi, a prominent MakerDAO community member, told Blockworks that MakerDAO faces two major issues with  offloading $3.5 billion in USDC for ETH. 

MakerDAO is backed by the status of the US dollar

The first problem Prosperi identified is that the Maker community is torn between two ideologies.

“The first [group] is looking at the protocol with rational eyes and the other wants to detach as much as possible from the US dollar and US regulation in general,” he said. 

“It’s very difficult to know what the protocol will prioritize because the two camps are not compatible.”

DAI’s value, pegged to the US dollar and partly collateralized by USDC, is ultimately backed by the status of US-issued fiat, Prosperi said. Many investors are using DAI as a proxy for the dollar on-chain, which they can then off-ramp and use in the real world.

Removing USDC from DAI’s collateral means saying goodbye to the real world — and Prosperi said he was unsure how this would be received by DAI token holders writ large.

The second major issue that concerns Prosperi is the technicalities behind moving so much USDC to ETH.

A handful of MakerDAO community members believe switching off the protocol’s Peg Stability Module (PSM) would inspire DAI to outstrip the dollar, depegging it upward, as there would be organic excess demand for DAI.

“This is true in the short term,” Prosperi said. “But obviously things could go both ways.”

Realities of moving USDC to ETH

Further, Prosperi is concerned that publicly announcing that the protocol intends to buy $3.5 billion of another asset can lead to unwanted attacks. 

“There are so many ways a hacker could attack this situation — the existential risk of this move for the protocol is massive,” he said. “I will do everything I can, governance-wise, to make sure to carefully engage MKR whales to think this through properly.”

Prosperi said he’ll soon release a recommendation piece on his blog Dirt Roads, covering the potential MakerDAO move.

Meanwhile, Christensen has backtracked some of his earlier statements made in MakerDAO’s Discord server. “What I actually wrote…was that yoloing all the stablecoin collateral into ETH would be a bad idea,” he tweeted. Christensen last Thursday said risks associated with partially swapping USDC for ETH “may be worth it.”

In any case, considering MakerDAO is one of the largest — and oldest — DAOs in the crypto ecosystem, all eyes are on the protocol to see what its next moves will be. After all, it may just set a precedent for the rest of DeFi to follow.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Hilton Park Lane

Tues - Wed, November 10 - 11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

Marina Bay Sands Singapore

Wednesday, October 07, 2026

DAS Asia is a a single-day summit at Marina Bay Sands Singapore featuring conversations between the builders, investors, and global leaders are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in Asia & North America.

recent research

Black Generic.png

Research

Compute demand is two-sided, the precondition for any hedging market. Producers (neoclouds and independent data centers) fear their inventory clears below cost. Consumers (inference platforms and the agentic application layer) fear compute will get more expensive. The common read holds that nonfungibility keeps both off any general exchange, since a buyer wants a named SKU in a named region rather than a basket, so the trade stays bilateral and the only exchange users are dealers hedging their book. That describes launch conditions, but understates how commodity markets form. Canonical benchmarks get made through trading, and reservations standardize as the curve deepens. The dealer-intermediated structure is not the end state, it is the seed of one.

Newsletter

The Breakdown

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Blockworks Research

Unlock crypto's most powerful research platform.

Our research packs a punch and gives you actionable takeaways for each topic.

SubscribeGet in touch

Blockworks Inc.

133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Blockworks Network

NewsPodcastsNewslettersEventsRoundtablesAnalytics