Get a demoExplore data

IMF lukewarm on crypto, notably receptive to CBDCs

IMF economists targeted Latin America and Caribbean regions on the topic of crypto for two reasons: high adoption and its history of “macroeconomic instability”

article-image

IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva | Alexandros Michailidis/Shutterstock modified by Blockworks

share

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) published a short piece Thursday discussing how Latin American and Caribbean countries have adopted cryptocurrencies and CBDCs at a breakneck pace compared to the rest of the world, citing Chainalysis data. 

The main takeaways from the IMF’s economists?

Well-designed CBDCs would simplify remittances and include more Latin American and Caribbean citizens in the financial system. But crypto as a whole is risky and needs to be regulated. 

The IMF highlighted the fact that CBDCs in Caribbean countries have been plagued by “slow take-up and disruptions in access” which could be solved by “investing in public awareness and robust infrastructure” to promote adoption. 

Kenya’s central bank also pointed to the challenges other nations have faced while attempting to launch a CBDC program in early June, opting to wait and see. 

As for the topic of properly regulating crypto, the IMF singled out Latin America and the Caribbean because it says these regions have “a history of macroeconomic instability, low institutional credibility, substantial capital flows, corruption, and extensive informal sectors.”

Its number one concern appears to be countries elevating crypto to the status of legal tender, something El Salvador did with bitcoin in June 2021. Back in 2022, the IMF pressed the country to remove bitcoin as a government-sanctioned currency, citing “large risks” associated with consumer protections.

In its Thursday article, the IMF reiterated what it laid out in its February 2023 guidelines for regulating digital assets. It pointed to the fact that crypto is inherently volatile and could shake the foundations of a country’s monetary system if there are big price swings. 

This is certainly something that El Salvador — which kept adding bitcoin to its coffers after it was made legal tender — confronted throughout 2022, when bitcoin (BTC) shed nearly 60% of its value. It’s important to note that El Salvador subsequently was still able to pay off an $800 million external bond in early 2023.

Even though the IMF’s view on bringing bitcoin up to parity with government-issued currency is quite well established at this point, it pushed back on countries that have opted to restrict crypto, namely Argentina and the Dominican Republic.

“This approach may not be effective in the long run. The region should instead focus on addressing the drivers of crypto demand, including citizens’ unmet digital payment needs,” IMF staff wrote. 

This shouldn’t be mistaken for the IMF supporting crypto. In fact, it said in February that “crypto assets have been more of a disappointment than a revolution for many users.” It also argued that private blockchains are preferable to public blockchains like Ethereum.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Hilton Park Lane, London

November 10-11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

Javits North

March 30-April 1, 2027

DAS NYC is a three-day summit at Javits North bringing together the builders, allocators, and policymakers shaping the future of digital assets across institutional finance and global markets.

recent research

Sponsored Article Template - DoubleZero White.png

Research

Every distributed system inherits the physical limitations, or advantages, of the network it runs on. Physics-bound systems can optimize their execution layers, compress their state, and parallelize their runtime, and still lose time they cannot recover to the speed of light through fiber and the routing decisions of carriers that are not optimized for consensus. The public internet routes traffic by least cost, not best performance. For a system where the order and timing of messages determine who earns and who loses, that is a structural tax and a measurable networking design flaw for traders.

The daily brief, in your inbox

Markets, protocols, and policy, read by 200K+ professionals.

Blockworks Inc.133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Solutions

InvestorsExchangesEnterprisesOnchain Businesses

© 2026 Blockworks Inc.

TermsPrivacy PolicyPrivacy CenterNews Archive