Introducing the Blockworks MCPLearn more

Get a demoExplore data

CoW DAO sets up MEV-capturing AMM for liquidity providers

Loss versus rebalancing remains a major centralizing force today, but CoW AMM is designed to solve this problem

article-image

CoW DAO and Adobe Stock modified by Blockworks

share

CoW DAO, the decentralized autonomous organization that helped build CoW Swap, is launching an MEV-capturing automated market maker for liquidity providers called CoW automated market maker (AMM).

The CoW AMM is designed to solve the ‘loss versus rebalancing’ (LVR) or ‘lever’ problem faced by liquidity providers (LP).

Most AMMs today rely on information from other exchanges to determine the market price of an asset. This means that there can be a discrepancy between the prices listed on the AMM and those listed on the exchange.

Opportunistic traders will often use this chance to arbitrage the AMM, which leads to LPs losing value. LVR, in this instance, is defined as the loss that LPs must incur as a result of arbitrage bots rebalancing liquidity pools.

According to Andrea Canidio, a senior research analyst at CoW Swap and author of the research paper Arbitrageurs’ Profits, LVR, and Sandwich Attacks, LVR is a major centralizing force today.

“It is the main reason for the current concentration in the block builder market, where three builders create more than 70% of blocks and have great control over what transactions are included in the blockchain,” Canido said.

In fact, research from Cornell University suggests that LPs for major token pairs earn less than 5-7% on their deposits because of LVR. Arbitrageurs make up an estimated $500 million in LP losses every year, becoming a driving factor in disincentivizing liquidity provision in the decentralized finance space. 

CoW AMM is designed to turn the competition into arbitrage liquidity pools that will provide an advantage to LPs. 

“In Constant Function AMMs, arbitrageurs compete to be higher in a block, and the first arbitrageur rebalances the pool at the worst possible price for the LPs. In CoW AMM, alternatively, solvers compete for the right to rebalance the pool by offering better and better prices to its LPs,” he said.

After a liquidity provider deposits tokens into a CoW AMM liquidity pool, those funds become accessible to CoW Swap traders. Solvers then compete to settle trades on CoW Swap, and bid to rebalance the AMM pools whenever there is an arbitrage opportunity. 

The solver that offers the most surplus is able to rebalance the pool, and thus protect LPs from MEV bots. 

Anyone can deploy liquidity into the CoW AMM via programmatic orders. To kick things off the ground, the CoW DAO has allocated 6 million COW and 139 WETH to increase COW/WETH market liquidity. 

Fernando Martinelli, CEO at Balancer Labs, noted in a press release reviewed by Blockworks that MEV/LVR is a key problem that is currently holding LPs back from joining AMMs.

“We at Balancer are super excited to explore custom AMM designs like CoW AMM,” he added.


Get the news in your inbox. Explore Blockworks newsletters:

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Marina Bay Sands Singapore

October 7, 2026

DAS Asia is a a single-day summit at Marina Bay Sands Singapore featuring conversations between the builders, investors, and global leaders are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in Asia & North America.

Hilton Park Lane, London

November 10-11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

Javits North

March 30-April 1, 2027

DAS NYC is a three-day summit at Javits North bringing together the builders, allocators, and policymakers shaping the future of digital assets across institutional finance and global markets.

recent research

Sponsored Article Template - DoubleZero White.png

Research

Every distributed system inherits the physical limitations, or advantages, of the network it runs on. Physics-bound systems can optimize their execution layers, compress their state, and parallelize their runtime, and still lose time they cannot recover to the speed of light through fiber and the routing decisions of carriers that are not optimized for consensus. The public internet routes traffic by least cost, not best performance. For a system where the order and timing of messages determine who earns and who loses, that is a structural tax and a measurable networking design flaw for traders.

The daily brief, in your inbox

Markets, protocols, and policy, read by 200K+ professionals.

Blockworks Inc.133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Solutions

InvestorsExchangesEnterprisesOnchain Businesses

© 2026 Blockworks Inc.

TermsPrivacy PolicyPrivacy CenterNews Archive