Bug in Ethereum Interface Causes Inadvertent Chain Split, Chaos on Network

All hands on deck to fix bug created by an old version of the Geth client, which is used by 75% of the Ethereum nodes

article-image

Blockworks Exclusive Art by axel rangel

share
  • A bug in the old version of Geth means that nodes running a new version of Geth are writing to a separate chain causing a de-facto chain split
  • Ethereum developers fear a double spend attack is possible

A bug in the software that many nodes use to write data to the Ethereum network is causing a chain split in the protocol, with approximately 54% of the Ethereum nodes now inadvertently writing data to a separate parallel chain. 

Go Ethereum, or Geth, is software that’s used as an interface layer between everything from miners, nodes, to dApps and the Ethereum blockchain. It’s by far the most popular software of this category, used by around 75% of the world’s Ethereum nodes.

GethSource: Ethernodes

Earlier this week the team released a hotfix to plug a vulnerability, promising later that it would release details on the bug it discovered after a sufficient number of node operators and projects updated their backends. 

However, this herd immunity didn’t come fast enough; only 28% of Ethereum users, and 46% of nodes (54% haven’t updated), are running the updated code — 1.10.8 — according to Ethernodes.org. Anything below this is vulnerable to the exploit (in the last hour nodes have begun to make the upgrades). 

However, while many of the nodes and projects haven’t made the update, Ethernodes reports that the majority of miners have. This means that the real, smaller, Ethereum network — not the erroneous network created by the bug — has a secure hashrate and isn’t susceptible to a double spend attack (where the collective hashrate of one group overpowers the other and is able to reverse or alter transactions).

Still, the problem is that many of the world’s dApps and DeFi projects are writing data to an erroneous chain that will need to be corrected later. Mining continues to exist unimpeded on the real network while many dApps and nodes are looking for data on the split network. 

Yearn Finance Founder Andre Cronje, advised the following via Twitter:

Loading Tweet..

Not the first time

This isn’t the first time that bugs in Geth have caused chaos on the Ethereum network. In November 2020 a failed roll-out of a Geth update, where many node operators failed to upgrade, briefly caused a chain split for Ethereum. The split caused a consensus failure and users temporarily interacted with different versions of the Ethereum blockchain, which, in turn, caused data loss.

That November 2020 bug led many to question how decentralized Ethereum really is, especially if a centralized bug can cause a sizable portion of its users to lose data and not interact with the “real” chain.

Even though this is a major technical issue for Ethereum, the price of ether seems to be unaffected as it’s still up 4.6% on-day at $3,243.76 according to CoinGecko.

Want more investor-focused content on digital assets? Join us September 13th and 14th for the Digital Asset Summit (DAS) in NYC. Use code ARTICLE for $75 off your ticket. Buy it now.

Tags

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Upcoming Events

Marina Bay Sands Singapore

October 7, 2026

DAS Asia is a a single-day summit at Marina Bay Sands Singapore featuring conversations between the builders, investors, and global leaders are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in Asia & North America.

Hilton Park Lane, London

November 10-11, 2026

DAS London is a two-day summit at the Hilton Park Lane in London featuring conversations between the builders, allocators, and policy makers who are shaping the trajectory of the digital asset ecosystem in the UK, Europe, and North America.

recent research

Onchain Gacha Cover Image.png

Research

Onchain gacha platforms sold $284.3 million of digital card packs in July 2026, and Collector Crypt accounted for more than half of that activity. However, it buys back 92.9% of what it sells, which leaves it with a third of the category's revenue on more than half of its volume, and a quarter of its activity arrives through partner apps whose users it does not own. Courtyard runs the opposite model, a consumer app selling smaller packs to thousands of retail buyers who resell the cards to each other, and it took 59.7% of category revenue while growing through a month the category spent contracting. This report compares the five largest platforms on gross activity, buyback intensity, revenue after buybacks, consumer composition, marketplace liquidity, and distribution ownership, and finds Courtyard the strongest performer as of July 2026, with the qualification that none of the five discloses inventory costs or resale proceeds, so no platform in the category can yet be shown to be profitable.

Newsletter

The Breakdown

Decoding crypto and the markets. Daily, with Byron Gilliam.

Blockworks Research

Unlock crypto's most powerful research platform.

Our research packs a punch and gives you actionable takeaways for each topic.

SubscribeGet in touch

Blockworks Inc.

133 W 19th St., New York, NY 10011

Blockworks Network

PodcastsNewslettersEventsRoundtablesAnalytics