Project & Team
Description of Project
Provide a concise narrative that clearly states each of (a)–(e) below.
- (a) Problem the project solves — The problem the project is solving.
- (b) Operational priorities — Provide a high-level description of how the project expects to support ongoing development and operations over time.
- (c) High-level project overview — How the project works at a high level.
- (d) Primary token functions — The primary functions of the token (e.g. gov participation).
- (e) Control surface reliance — If any, briefly describe the anticipated or possible evolution of the protocol's governance/control model.
(a) Problem the project solves
Beefy addresses the challenge of optimizing yield across the DeFi ecosystem. As a decentralized, multichain yield optimizer, Beefy enables users to earn compound interest on their crypto holdings through Vaults that use smart-contract-enforced investment strategies to automatically maximize rewards from liquidity pools and other yield farming opportunities, compounding farm reward tokens back into the initially deposited asset.
(b) Operational priorities
Beefy's operational model is centered on Vaults, its main product, as part of a decentralized, multichain yield optimizer. Vault strategies are secured and enforced by smart contracts and are designed to automatically maximize user rewards by compounding farm reward tokens back into the initially deposited asset. Alongside Vaults, Beefy operates Cowcentrated Liquidity Manager (CLM) products, which manage concentrated liquidity positions on V3-style decentralized exchanges by automatically rebalancing the position around the current price and harvesting trading fees.
Governance support is provided through the BIFI token, whose holders are entitled to vote in important Beefy DAO governance decisions.
Beefy is maintained and further developed by Core Contributors, funded by the protocol treasury through quarterly budgets approved by DAO members.
(c) High-level project overview
Beefy is a decentralized, multichain yield optimizer that allows users to earn compound interest on their crypto holdings. Its main product is Vaults, which use smart-contract-secured investment strategies to automatically maximize user rewards from liquidity pools, automated market making projects, and other DeFi yield opportunities. The Vault strategies compound farm reward tokens from decentralized exchanges back into the initially deposited asset.
Beefy also offers Cowcentrated Liquidity Manager (CLM) products, which manage concentrated liquidity positions on V3-style decentralized exchanges. CLM automatically rebalances the position around the current price and harvests trading fees, so users get concentrated liquidity exposure without manually managing ranges.
Funds are never locked in any Beefy contract, users can withdraw at any time, and users remain 100% in control of their crypto while funds are staked in a vault.
(d) Primary token functions
BIFI is the governance token of the Beefy DAO and serves as the central asset connecting stakeholders across the Beefy project. Tokenholders are entitled to vote on important DAO governance decisions. BIFI also functions in tokenholder incentive programs: a portion of revenue generated by Beefy platform is directed to tokenholder incentives, which are regularly paid through the BIFI Pool and BIFI Vault; tokenholders must deposit BIFI to participate in those programs.
(e) Control surface reliance
No anticipated or possible evolution of the protocol’s governance/control model
Known Project Team
For each existing entity: Labs/DevCo (e.g., Founder, CEO, CTO, COO), Foundation (e.g., President, Executive Director, CFO, COO), and DAO / onchain governance leadership (if applicable) list the:
- (a) full names,
- (b) official titles,
- (c) and prior experience of key team members.
For any non-existent entity, explicitly mention it does not exist. External links may be included but they will not factor into the score.
Labs / DevCo
Full Name | Official Title | Prior Experience |
|---|---|---|
No Labs/Devco exists. |
Foundation
Full Name | Official Title | Prior Experience |
|---|---|---|
No Foundation exists. Beefy has no foundation or other legal entity in any jurisdiction. |
DAO / Onchain Governance
Full Name | Official Title | Prior Experience |
|---|---|---|
armads | Core Contributor | |
chebiN | Core Contributor | |
DefiDebauchery | Core Contributor | |
GPMS | Core Contributor | |
Eren | Core Contributor | |
frondoto | Core Contributor | |
jackgale.eth | Core Contributor | |
Pablo | Core Contributor | |
Power | Core Contributor | |
Chimp | Core Contributor | |
Roman Monk | Core Contributor | |
TBC | Core Contributor | |
Weso | Core Contributor | |
YR | Core Contributor |
DAO Structure
Provide a structured description of the DAO's governance, powers, and economic rights. If a DAO does not exist, state so for each sub question. Even if there is no DAO, there must be an answer to (d). Address the lettered items below.
- (a) IP ownership & control — State what IP the DAO owns or controls (e.g., codebases/repos, trademarks/brands). Note any license if relevant.
- (b) Contract/admin powers — List on-chain or administrative authorities and limits: pause/upgrade roles (e.g., multisig pause), governance-executor authorities, and the method of authority for each (e.g., veto, majority, super-majority).
- (c) Locked-token rights (conditional) — If locking/staking for additional rights exists, explain the additional rights and what tokenholders can and cannot decide. If no locking mechanism exists, leave absent.
- (d) Current tokenholder governance rights and economic arrangements — If any, describe the current governance rights of tokenholders and any presently operative rights or arrangements relating to treasury actions, fee-routing, rewards, buybacks, or other protocol-controlled resources. If none, state that explicitly.
- (e) Control surface reliance — If any, briefly describe the anticipated or possible evolution of the protocol's governance/control model.
- (f) Dissolution authority — State who can dissolve/wind up the DAO and by what mechanism (e.g., on-chain vote threshold, board resolution of a legal wrapper).
(a) IP ownership & control
the DAO owns or controls no IP
(b) Contract/admin powers
Beefy has no foundation or legal entity. Contract and administrative powers are held by Core Contributors through multisig wallets on each chain. These powers include pausing vaults and strategies, upgrading or retiring strategies, and adjusting protocol parameters such as fees. Every action requires majority approval from 4 of 7 multisig signers, so no single contributor can act alone. Strategy changes and upgrades also pass through a 6-hour timelock, and scheduled timelock transactions are published live on the Beefy Discord. Vault funds cannot be withdrawn or seized by any admin role.
Governance-executor authority: BIFI holders vote on proposals through Snapshot, and these votes are not executed on-chain automatically. Core Contributors act as the executive body. They carry out approved proposals and hold delegated authority over day-to-day operations. Any Core Contributor decision can be put to a token holder vote. Core Contributors also moderate governance and may remove proposals that are malicious, unfair, impossible to execute, unclear, or that allow too little time to vote. Token holders have no on-chain veto over multisig actions.
(c) Locked-token rights (conditional)
Tokenholders are entitled to vote in important Governance decisions for the DAO. A part of all revenue generated by vaults within the Beefy Protocol is directed towards tokenholder Incentive Programmes, and incentives are regularly paid out through the BIFI Pool and BIFI Vault. Tokenholders must deposit their BIFI tokens to participate in the BIFI Pool and BIFI Vault. It adds no voting rights. Depositors cannot set incentive rates or fee routing.
(d) Current tokenholder governance rights and economic arrangements
- BIFI is the governance token of the Beefy DAO. Tokenholders are entitled to vote on Snapshot to approve quarterly Core Contributor budgets, treasury spending, the revenue share paid to holders, and any other protocol decision put to a vote. A portion of all revenue generated by vaults within the Beefy Protocol is directed toward token holders.
- Token holders must deposit their BIFI in the BIFI Pool or BIFI Vault to receive a share of protocol revenue.
- BIFI Vaults buys BIFI on market with fee revenue
(e) Control surface reliance
No anticipated or possible evolution of the protocol’s governance/control
(f) Dissolution authority
No single party has authority to dissolve or wind up Beefy. The protocol is governed by BIFI token holders, so dissolution could only happen through the standard governance process: a proposal submitted on Beefy's Snapshot by a holder of at least 1 BIFI and passed by a simple majority of votes cast. Beefy has never adopted a formal quorum, so none applies. No individual, core contributor, or legal entity can unilaterally dissolve the DAO. No dissolution proposal has been made to date.
Primary Foundation
For the Primary Foundation do the following independently. If a Foundation does not exist, state so for each sub question. Items (a)–(f) apply only if that entity exists; state explicitly that the entity doesn't exist. Definition: The primary Foundation can be explained as the entity which is directly involved in the issuance of the native token at launch.
- (a) Entity — Type and jurisdiction.
- (b) IP ownership & control — What IP the entity owns/controls (repos/code, trademarks/brand; license optional)
- (c) Powers over DAO, treasury, protocol-controlled resources, and token administration — If any, describe the current powers over DAO governance, treasury actions, protocol-controlled resources (e.g. revenue), token administration, or reward parameters, and the method/threshold for each.
- (d) Powers over DevCo — Explain whether the foundation can exert direct or indirect influence over decision-making of the DevCo.
- (e) Contract/admin powers — Pause/upgrade/governance-executor authorities, and the method/threshold for each (e.g., veto/majority/super-majority).
- (f) Current economic arrangements and distribution policies — Describe any current governance-approved, contractual, or programmatic mechanisms, if any, by which protocol-controlled resources, treasury assets, fees, revenue, rewards, or token distributions may be directed to this entity, its equityholders, contributors, or other participants. If no such mechanism currently exists, state that explicitly.
(a) Entity
No such entity exists.
(b) IP ownership & control
No such Primary Foundation exist
(c) Powers over DAO, treasury, protocol-controlled resources, and token administration
No Primary Foundation or current powers of a Primary Foundation over DAO governance
Governance sits solely with BIFI token holders
(d) Powers over DevCo
No such Primary Foundation exist
(e) Contract/admin powers
No such Primary Foundation exist
(f) Current economic arrangements and distribution policies
A part of all revenue generated by vaults within the Beefy Protocol is directed toward tokenholder Incentive Programmes. Incentives are regularly paid out through the protocol’s BIFI Pool and BIFI Vault, and tokenholders must deposit their BIFI tokens to participate in those programs. The Beefy DAO does not issue BIFI tokens and does not trade in BIFI tokens.
Primary DevCo
For the Primary DevCo do the following independently. If an entity does not exist, state that explicitly across each sub-question. Items (a)–(f) apply only if that entity exists; state explicitly that the entity doesn't exist. Definition: The primary DevCo can be explained as the entity which is directly involved in the issuance of the native token at launch.
- (a) Entity — Type and jurisdiction.
- (b) IP ownership & control — What IP the entity owns/controls (repos/code, trademarks/brand; license optional)
- (c) Powers over DAO, treasury, protocol-controlled resources, and token administration — If any, describe the current powers over DAO governance, treasury actions, protocol-controlled resources (e.g. revenue), token administration, or reward parameters, and the method/threshold for each.
- (d) Powers over Foundation — Explain whether the DevCo can exert direct or indirect influence over decision-making of the Foundation.
- (e) Contract/admin powers — Pause/upgrade/governance-executor authorities and the method/threshold for each (e.g., veto/majority/super-majority; "3/5 multisig").
- (f) Current economic arrangements and distribution policies — Describe any current governance-approved, contractual, or programmatic mechanisms, if any, by which protocol-controlled resources, treasury assets, fees, revenue, rewards, or token distributions may be directed to this entity, its equityholders, contributors, or other participants. If no such mechanism currently exists, state that explicitly. Do not discuss hypothetical future dividends, repurchases, or distributions unless formally adopted.
(a) Entity
No such entity exists
(b) IP ownership & control
No such entity exists
(c) Powers over DAO, treasury, protocol-controlled resources, and token administration
No such entity exists
Governance sits solely with BIFI token holders
(d) Powers over Foundation
No such entity exists
(e) Contract/admin powers
Pause and upgrade authority is held by Beefy's core developer contributors through a multisig wallet, requiring majority approval from 4 of 7 signers for any action.
(f) Current economic arrangements and distribution policies
Beefy is maintained and further developed by Core Contributors, funded by the protocol treasury through quarterly budgets approved by DAO members.
Token Supply & Allocations
Initial Allocation
Download the Worksheet, enable macros, complete the Initial Allocation sheet, then use Convert To CSV to export the file for import here. To make edits after importing, update the worksheet, use Convert To CSV again, then re-import the new CSV.
Ticker | Date | Allocation Category Name | Recipient Type | Allocation % | Allocation Tokens | TGE Unlock % | TGE Unlock Tokens | Cliff Months | Cliff Unlock % | Linear Vesting Months | Cadence Months | Circulating Treatment | Notes on what each category is used for | If applicable: Contract / Wallet address |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Governance Pool 1 (wBNB) | Community | 0.175 | 14000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Governance Pool 2 (ETH) | Community | 0.175 | 14000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Governance Pool 3 (LINK) | Community | 0.175 | 14000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Governance Pool 4 (CREAM) | Community | 0.175 | 14000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Governance Pool 5 (BNB-BUSD) | Community | 0.1 | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Governance Pool 6 (BNB-SPARTA) | Community | 0.1 | 8000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Original Team Timelock 1 | Team | 0.025 | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Original Team Timelock 2 | Team | 0.025 | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Original Team Timelock 3 | Team | 0.025 | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Yes | ||
BIFI | 9/22/20 | Original Team Timelock 4 | Team | 0.025 | 2000 | 0 | 0 | 21 | 1 | 0 | 1 | Yes |
Airdrop Process
State the project's airdrop status plainly, and back it up:
- Never conducted and none planned for TGE: state so plainly.
- Planned but not yet executed: state the target user segments (e.g., "stakers of X," "Aave users") and the allocation method (e.g., proportional to balance or net position), and commit to publishing a recipient wallet list in a public channel and providing it to Blockworks quarterly until the initial TGE airdrop is fully completed.
- Already executed: state the covered user segments and the allocation method, and point to a per-address source such as CSV/TSV/JSON files, a Dune table, a full Merkle dump, GitHub repo files embedding per-address allocations, or RPC endpoints that expose claim/amount data; explorer links alone do not count.
Never conducted and none planned for TGE
Transactions & Market Structures
Market Maker Agreements & Deals
Projects must disclose all material terms of market-making arrangements that affect token liquidity. If the project has no agreements or deals with market makers, state that explicitly. For each market maker, include in a table:
- (a) Market maker's name — the market maker's name;
- (b) Token allocation or loaned amount — the token allocation or loaned amount as a percentage of total supply;
- (c) Duration/term of agreement — the duration/term of the agreement; and, where applicable,
- (d) Name of agreement structure — label the financial vehicle being used in the agreement (i.e. loan, option/call, retainer model).
If no native tokens were loaned or allocated to market makers, state that explicitly; cash/fiat retainers or fees are not required for (b).
Market Maker Name | Token Allocation Committed | Term Duration | Structure Name |
|---|---|---|---|
Beefy has no current agreements with Market Makers. |
Exchange Agreements & Deals
Projects must disclose all material terms of centralized or decentralized exchange listings that affect token liquidity. For each listing, include in a table:
- (a) Exchange name / DEX pool — the exchange name (and, for DEX, the specific pool/pair);
- (b) Token allocation for listing — the token allocation supplied or committed for listing as a percentage of total supply;
- (c) Term Duration — the duration/term of any listing lockups, liquidity, or incentive programs; and, where applicable,
- (d) Native-token listing fees — whether any listing fees were paid in native tokens, with amounts (tokens or % of supply), recipients, and any vesting or lock terms tied to the partnership.
If the project has no agreements or deals with CEX or DEX, state that explicitly; doing so earns full credit; cash/fiat fee amounts are not required for this item.
Exchange Name | Token Allocation Committed | Term Duration | Native Token Listing Fees |
|---|---|---|---|
Beefy has no current agreements with exchanges. |
Financial Disclosures & Risks
Prior Token Sales & Fundraising
Disclose all prior token sales by the Project — including fundraising rounds, any material OTC sales to investors, and any discounted market-maker sales. For each sale, provide:
- (a) Series Name;
- (b) Early-Stage Investment Instrument used (i.e. SAFT, STAMP, SAFE, SAFE+Token Warrant, etc.);
- (c) Date of sale (at least month & year);
- (d) Number of tokens sold (or % of total supply);
- (e) Vesting schedule.
If no prior sales occurred, state that explicitly (e.g., "No prior fundraising, OTC, or discounted MM sales have occurred.").
Series Name | Investment Instrument | Date Of Sale | Number of tokens sold | Vesting Schedule |
|---|---|---|---|---|
No prior fundraising, OTC, or discounted market-maker sales have occurred. BIFI's entire circulating supply was distributed in September 2020 through a liquidity mining program, with no tokens sold to investors. |
Previous Exploits Affecting The Native Token
If any, list prior exploits or incidents that directly affected the token, token supply, tokenholder balances, token contract, minting controls, burn mechanics, or custody of token supply. This question is not asking about general protocol, application, or smart contract exploits unless the incident directly affected the native token itself. If no prior incidents, state this explicitly (e.g., "No exploits affecting tokenholders or protocol funds as of YYYY-MM-DD").
- (a) Date & component affected — Date (YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD), chain(s)/component affected.
- (b) Exploit vector summary — Plain-language summary of the exploit vector (what the hack was).
- (c) Quantified impact — Quantified impact (assets/tokens affected or a clear "no loss of funds" statement).
- (d) Remediation/response taken — Remediation/response taken (patches, upgrades, governance actions, compensation).
- (e) Current status — Current status (resolved, in litigation, under investigation, refunded, etc.).
- (f) References — Link(s) to post-mortem/advisory/PR.
(a) Date & component affected
No incidents affecting the token as of 2026-08-29
(b) Exploit vector summary
No incidents affecting the token as of 2026-08-29
(c) Quantified impact
No incidents affecting the token as of 2026-08-29
(d) Remediation/response taken
No incidents affecting the token as of 2026-08-29
(e) Current status
No incidents affecting the token as of 2026-08-29
(f) References
No post-mortem, advisory, or PR references for prior token incidents are disclosed in this filing.
Material Risk Factors (Regulation, Technology, Token Economics)
Describe material risk factors across the three categories below. Each category includes prompts to address at a minimum.
-
(a) Regulatory, Legal & Tax Risks — Describe how evolving laws and regulations could affect the project by answering, at a minimum, questions like:
-
Impact of Regulatory Change on TGE and Listings: (If applicable) How could evolving or conflicting laws and regulations affect your ability to complete the TGE, deliver tokens to purchasers, and list or maintain the token on trading venues in key jurisdictions?
-
Entity-Level Regulatory Impact: (If applicable) How could regulatory or legal changes impact your core entities (Foundation, DevCo, DAO, affiliated service providers), including enforcement actions, licensing requirements, or forced changes to structure or operations?
-
Tokenholder Tax Treatment: (If applicable) What uncertainties exist around how tokenholders may be taxed, and make clear that tokenholders are responsible for understanding their own tax obligations?
-
Jurisdictional & User Access Restrictions: (If applicable) If the project restricts access for certain jurisdictions or user types (e.g., U.S. persons, sanctioned countries, retail vs. professional), what are those restrictions and what risks do they create for users and for the project?
-
(b) Protocol, Technology & Security Risks — Describe risks to network and contract reliability, correctness, and safety by answering, at a minimum, questions like:
-
Bugs and Design Flaws: (If applicable) What bugs, design flaws, or implementation errors could exist in your core protocol code, smart contracts, and any bridges, rollups, or oracles that you depend on, and how could these lead to loss of funds or disruption of the protocol?
-
Security Measures & Their Limitations: (If applicable) What security measures have you taken (audits, formal verification, bug bounties), and what types of failures might these measures still fail to detect or prevent?
-
(c) Token Economics, Unlocks & Incentive Risks — Describe how the token's economic design and supply schedule could affect holders by answering, at a minimum, questions like:
-
Critical Economic Assumptions: (If applicable) Which economic assumptions (e.g., staking yields, fee revenue, liquidity incentives, MEV capture, demand for blockspace) are critical for protocol security, utility, and governance, and what happens if those assumptions fail?
-
Governance Control over Monetary Policy & Rewards: (If applicable) To what extent can governance change monetary policy, fee parameters, or reward allocations (e.g., inflation rate, treasury flows, incentive programs), and how could such changes adversely affect tokenholders?
(a) Regulatory, Legal & Tax Risks
BIFI's TGE and initial distribution were completed in September 2020, so regulatory change cannot affect token delivery. However, evolving or conflicting laws on DeFi, digital assets, or decentralized governance could affect BIFI's ability to be listed or remain listed on trading venues in certain jurisdictions, and could limit which users can access the Beefy app or its products.
Beefy has no foundation, company, or other legal entity. It operates as a DAO governed by BIFI holders and maintained by pseudonymous Core Contributors.
The tax treatment of BIFI, staking rewards from the BIFI Pool and BIFI Vault, and vault yields is uncertain and varies by jurisdiction. Token holders are solely responsible for understanding and meeting their own tax obligations.
(b) Protocol, Technology & Security Risks
Beefy's vaults and strategies interact with third-party protocols (DEXs, farms, lending markets), so a bug, exploit, or design flaw in any of them could cause loss of funds in the related Beefy vaults.
To reduce these risks, Beefy uses audited and battle-tested code where possible, follows internal SAFE review standards for new strategies, secures privileged functions with multisigs and a 6-hour timelock, runs a bug bounty programme, and has had CLM audited by Zellic, Cyfrin, Certora, and Sherlock. These measures can't fully prevent failures in third-party protocols, novel attack vectors, economic exploits, or bugs that audits and reviews miss.
(c) Token Economics, Unlocks & Incentive Risks
Holder revenue share is tied to vault revenue: a part of all revenue generated by vaults within the Beefy Protocol is directed toward tokenholder incentive programmes, and incentives are regularly paid through the BIFI Pool and BIFI Vault. Tokenholders must deposit their BIFI tokens to participate in the BIFI Pool and BIFI Vault.
Because the revenue share depends on vault revenue, it falls as TVL and yields fall, with no floor. No unlocks remain, and the full 80,000 BIFI supply is circulating.
Fee parameter changes require a governance vote to pass before they can be executed. Once approved, Core Contributors implement them through the 4-of-7 multisig after a 6-hour timelock.
This Token Transparency Filing is provided for general informational purposes only. Blockworks reviews completeness only and does not verify or warrant the accuracy of individual answers. Beefy is solely responsible for the content, accuracy, and legality of its disclosures.