# B1 v1.0 Token Transparency Template

Framework: B1
TTF version: 1.0

<!-- Complete each Answer section. Do not include private or non-public information. -->

## Project & Team

### 1. Description of Project

Category: Project & Team

Instructions: Provide a concise narrative that clearly states:
- (a) Problem the project solves — the problem the project is solving,
- (b) Operational priorities — Provide a high-level description of how the project expects
to support ongoing development and operations over time
- (c) High-level project overview — how the project works at a high level,
- (d) Primary token functions — the primary functions of the token (e.g. gov
participation),
- (e) Control surface reliance — if any, briefly describe the anticipated or possible
evolution of the protocol’s governance/control model,

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

### 2. Known Project Team

Category: Project & Team

Instructions: For each existing entity: Labs/DevCo (e.g., Founder, CEO, CTO, COO),
Foundation (e.g., President, Executive Director, CFO, COO), and DAO / onchain governance
leadership (if applicable) list the:
- (a) full names,
- (b) official titles,
- (c) and prior experience of key team members.
- For any non-existent entity, explicitly mention it does not exist. External links may be
included but they will not factor into the score. Edge note: A compound role (e.g.,
Founder/CEO) counts as one person with a compound title.

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

### 3. DAO Structure

Category: Project & Team

Instructions: Provide a structured description of the DAO’s governance, powers, and economic
rights. If a DAO does not exist, state so. Address the lettered items below. Item (c) may be left
absent if not applicable. Even if there is no DAO, there must be an answer to (d).
- (a) IP ownership & control — State what IP the DAO owns or controls (e.g.,
codebases/repos, trademarks/brands). Note any license if relevant.
- (b) Contract/admin powers — List on-chain or administrative authorities and limits:
pause/upgrade roles (e.g., multisig pause), governance-executor authorities, and the
method of authority for each (e.g., veto, majority, super-majority).
- (c) Locked-token rights (conditional) — If locking/staking for additional rights exists,
explain the additional rights and what tokenholders can and cannot decide. If no locking
mechanism exists, leave absent.
- (d) Value accrual & holder rights — If any, describe the current rights of tokenholders
over revenue distribution and the treasury.
- (e) Dissolution authority — State who can dissolve/wind up the DAO and by what
mechanism (e.g., on-chain vote threshold, board resolution of a legal wrapper).

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

### 4. Primary Foundation

Category: Project & Team

Instructions: For the Primary Foundation do the following independently. If an entity does not
exist, state that explicitly. Items (a)–(f) apply only if that entity exists; state explicitly that the
entity doesn’t exist.
- (a) Entity — type and jurisdiction.
- (b) IP ownership & control — what IP the entity owns/controls (repos/code,
trademarks/brand; license optional) and an explanation of any subsidiary entities.
- (c) Powers over DAO, treasury, protocol-controlled resources, and token
administration — If any, describe the current powers over DAO governance, treasury
actions, protocol-controlled resources (e.g. revenue), token administration, or reward
parameters, and the method/threshold for each.
- (d) Powers over DevCo — explain whether the foundation can exert direct or indirect
influence over decision-making of the DevCo.
- (e) Contract/admin powers — pause/upgrade/governance-executor authorities and the
method/threshold for each (e.g., veto/majority/super-majority; “3/5 multisig”).
- (f) Current economic arrangements and distribution policies — Describe any current
governance-approved, contractual, or programmatic mechanisms, if any, by which
protocol-controlled resources, treasury assets, fees, revenue, rewards, or token
distributions may be directed to this entity, its equityholders, contributors, or other
participants. If no such mechanism currently exists, state that explicitly. Do not discuss
hypothetical future dividends, repurchases, or distributions unless formally adopted.
Definitions: The primary Foundation and DevCo can be explained as those entities which are
directly involved in the issuance of the native token at launch.

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

### 5. Primary Dev Co

Category: Project & Team

Instructions: For the Primary DevCo do the following independently. If an entity does not exist,
state that explicitly. Items (a)–(f) apply only if that entity exists; state explicitly that the entity
doesn’t exist.
- (a) Entity — type and jurisdiction.
- (b) IP ownership & control — what IP the entity owns/controls (repos/code,
trademarks/brand; license optional) and an explanation of any subsidiary entities.
- (c) Powers over DAO, treasury, protocol-controlled resources, and token
administration — If any, describe the current powers over DAO governance, treasury
actions, protocol-controlled resources (e.g. revenue), token administration, or reward
parameters, and the method/threshold for each.
- (d) Powers over Foundation — explain whether the DevCo can exert direct or indirect
influence over decision-making of the Foundation.
- (e) Contract/admin powers — pause/upgrade/governance-executor authorities and the
method/threshold for each (e.g., veto/majority/super-majority; “3/5 multisig”).
- (f) Current economic arrangements and distribution policies — Describe any current
governance-approved, contractual, or programmatic mechanisms, if any, by which
protocol-controlled resources, treasury assets, fees, revenue, rewards, or token
distributions may be directed to this entity, its equityholders, contributors, or other
participants. If no such mechanism currently exists, state that explicitly. Do not discuss
hypothetical future dividends, repurchases, or distributions unless formally adopted.
Definitions: The primary Foundation and DevCo can be explained as those entities which are
directly involved in the issuance of the native token at launch.

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

## Token Supply & Allocations

### 6. Initial Allocation

Category: Token Supply & Allocations

Instructions: Disclose launch and initial supply details in a single initial allocation schedule
covering the token’s launch. Include:
- (a) Launch supply totals — the total number of tokens issued at launch, the total
number of tokens locked at launch, and the total number of tokens unlocked at launch;
- (b) Recipient categories & use of funds — the recipient categories with brief
explanations as to how the category will use the tokens so an auditor can distinguish
each bucket;
- (c) Initial price per token — the expected initial price per token;
- (d) Ticker / market symbol — the ticker/market symbol;
- (e) Total supply & supply regime — the total supply and whether the supply is fixed (if
not explain inflation rate or deflation rate);
- (f) Initial vesting / release schedules — the initial vesting/release schedules (identify
which categories/recipients are subject to vesting and the high-level timing logic);

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

### 7. Airdrop Process

Category: Token Supply & Allocations

Instructions:
If the project has planned but not yet airdropped, it must:
- (a) commit to publish, in a public channel and provide to Blockworks quarterly a
recipient wallet list until the initial TGE airdrop is fully completed,
- (b) Generally state the possible target user segments (e.g., “stakers of X,” “Aave
users”) and the allocation method (e.g., proportional to ve-balance or net
position).
If the project has already airdropped, it must:
- (a) For executed airdrops, point to an per-address source such as
CSV/TSV/JSON files, a Dune table, a full Merkle dump, GitHub repo files
embedding per-address allocations, or RPC endpoints that expose claim/amount
data; explorer links alone don’t count.
- (b) Clearly state covered user segments (e.g., “stakers of X,” “Aave users”) and
the allocation method (e.g., proportional to ve-balance or net position).
If the project does not plan to do an airdrop for TGE, it must:
- (a)If no airdrop has ever been conducted, say so plainly (“We have never
conducted an airdrop to date and do not plan to execute one”).

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

## Transactions & Market Structures

### 8. Market Maker Agreements & Deals

Category: Transactions & Market Structures

Instructions: Projects must disclose all material terms of market-making arrangements that
affect token liquidity. If the project has no agreements or deals with market makers, state that
explicitly; doing so earns full credit. For each market maker, include in a table:
- (a) Market maker’s name — the market maker’s name;
- (b) Token allocation or loaned amount — the token allocation or loaned
amount as a percentage of total supply;
- (c) Duration/term of agreement — the duration/term of the agreement; and,
where applicable,
- (d) Name of agreement structure — label the financial vehicle being used in the
agreement (i.e. loan, option/call, retainer model) without describing trading
strategy or expected outcomes.
If the project has no agreements or deals with market makers, state that explicitly; doing so
earns full credit. If no native tokens were loaned or allocated to market makers, state that
explicitly; cash/fiat retainers or fees are not required for this item.

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

### 9. CEX / DEX Agreements & Deals

Category: Transactions & Market Structures

Instructions: Projects must disclose all material terms of centralized or decentralized exchange
listings that affect token liquidity. For each listing, include in a table:
- (a) Exchange name / DEX pool — the exchange name (and, for DEX, the
specific pool/pair);
- (b) Token allocation for listing — the token allocation supplied or committed for
listing as a percentage of total supply;
- (c) Term Duration — the duration/term of any listing lockups, liquidity, or
incentive programs; and, where applicable,
- (d) Native-token listing fees — whether any listing fees were paid in native
tokens, with amounts (tokens or % of supply), recipients, and any vesting or lock
terms tied to the partnership.
If the project has no agreements or deals with CEX or DEX, state that explicitly; doing so earns
full credit. If no native-token listing fees were paid, state that explicitly; cash/fiat fee amounts are
not required for this item.

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

## Financial Disclosures & Risks

### 10. Prior Token Sales & Fundraising

Category: Financial Disclosures & Risks

Instructions: Disclose all prior token sales by the Project — including fundraising rounds,
any material OTC sales to investors, and any discounted market-maker sales. For each
sale, provide:
- (a) Series Name
- (b) Early-Stage Investment Instrument used (i.e. SAFT, STAMP, SAFE,
SAFE+Token Warrant, etc.)
- (c) Date of sale (at least month & year).
- (d) Number of tokens sold (or % of total supply)
- (e) Vesting schedule
- If no prior sales occurred, state that explicitly (e.g., “No prior fundraising, OTC, or
discounted MM sales have occurred.”)

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

### 11. Previous Exploits Affecting The Project

Category: Financial Disclosures & Risks

Instructions: If any, list prior exploits or incidents that directly affected the token, token supply,
tokenholder balances, token contract, minting controls, burn mechanics, or custody of token
supply. This question is not asking about general protocol, application, or smart contract exploits
unless the incident directly affected the native token itself. For each incident, provide:
- (a) Date & component affected — date (YYYY-MM or YYYY-MM-DD),
chain(s)/component affected;
- (b) Exploit vector summary — plain-language summary of the exploit vector
(what the hack was);
- (c) Quantified impact — quantified impact (assets/tokens affected or a clear “no
loss of funds” statement);
- (d) Remediation/response taken — remediation/response taken (patches,
upgrades, governance actions, compensation);
- (e) Current status — current status (resolved, in litigation, under investigation,
refunded, etc.);
- (f) References (optional) — references (optional): link(s) to
post-mortem/advisory/PR.
- If no prior incidents, state this explicitly (e.g., “No exploits affecting tokenholders or
protocol funds as of YYYY-MM-DD”).

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

### 12. Material Risk Factors (Regulation, Technology, Token Economics)

Category: Financial Disclosures & Risks

**Answer**

<!-- Add answer here. -->

